Etude said:
particularly after the exodus from captivity in Babylon
You DO realize that the Exodus story, as depicted in Exodus, is likely just a Hebrew tall tale, questionable to have ever occurred based on the complete lack of historical evidence? It's as much of a Hebraic myth as Noah's Flood....
Bill Devers, Finkelstein, etc have presented overwhelming evidence to cast doubt on the historicity of the Exodus account, based on a total lack of evidence of 2 million people living in the desert (people leave animal bones after eating, rubbish), evidence of sites which indicate an ongoing existence in the Southern Levant during the time they were supposed to be "slaves" in Egypt, or no evidence of destruction of cities claimed as destroyed, and no evidence of cities existing at the time they claimed to be destroyed.
The Exodus account MAY be based on small groups who migrated from Egypt, but "2 million" people, led by a Moses? Not a chance....